Assessment of patient preferences: integrating treatments and outcomes.

نویسندگان

  • Terri R Fried
  • Elizabeth H Bradley
  • Virginia R Towle
چکیده

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to develop a patient-centered measure of treatment preference applicable across a range of diseases and treatment decisions. METHODS Instrument development was based on previous research supplemented by open-ended interviews and focus groups. Psychometric properties of the instrument were determined by administration to 125 persons aged 60 or older with a limited life expectancy secondary to congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cancer. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were established using intraclass correlation coefficients. Construct validity was established by examining associations of the measure with a single-item question regarding treatment goals and with age, ethnicity, and functional impairment, characteristics known to be associated with preferences. The Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatment instrument (WALT) consists of 6 scenarios in which respondents weigh treatment burden against treatment outcomes expressed in terms of the likelihood of different health states and length of life following treatment. RESULTS Inter-rater reliability ranged from .73 to .95 and test-retest reliability from .49 to .93. WALT scores were significantly associated with a simpler measure of preference and with age, ethnicity, and functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS The WALT measures patients' treatment preferences, assessed in the context of treatment burden and multiple aspects of treatment outcome with sound psychometric properties.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Inclusion and Consideration of Patient Preferences in Amnog Early Benefit Assessments.

Patient perspective is becoming increasingly important in healthcare decision making. Patients should be involved as ‘end-users’ in the health technology assessment (HTA) processes to broaden the perspectives of the assessments and advice provided to decision makers1. Patients can provide information on their daily experience with disease, treatments and their needs, provide views on aspects no...

متن کامل

Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach

BACKGROUND There are diverse opinions and confusion about defining and including patient values and preferences (i.e. the importance people place on the health outcomes) in the guideline development processes. This article aims to provide an overview of a process for systematically incorporating values and preferences in guideline development. METHODS In 2013 and 2014, we followed the Grading...

متن کامل

Weighing Clinical Evidence Using Patient Preferences: An Application of Probabilistic Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

The need for patient engagement has been recognized by regulatory agencies, but there is no consensus about how to operationalize this. One approach is the formal elicitation and use of patient preferences for weighing clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to demonstrate how patient preferences can be used to weigh clinical outcomes when both preferences and clinical outcomes are uncerta...

متن کامل

Choosing the surgical mortality threshold for high risk patients with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer: insights from decision analysis.

The recent British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that surgical mortality should not be greater than 8% for pneumonectomy and 4% for lobectomy. These cut offs are advanced as guidelines to inform decision making as to whether or not patients with operable lung cancer should be offered surgery. They have been developed from a notion of what acceptable surgical mortality should be. The pla...

متن کامل

The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND The importance of respecting patients' preferences when making treatment decisions is increasingly recognized. Efficiently retrieving papers from the scientific literature reporting on the presence and nature of such preferences can help to achieve this goal. The objective of this study was to create a search filter for PubMed to help retrieve evidence on patient preferences for trea...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences

دوره 57 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002